Skip to main content

Blog

Rideshare Sexual Assault

What You Need to Know About Rideshare Sexual Assault

Who’s Responsible for a Rideshare-Related Assault? What Should One Do After an Uber or Lyft Sexual Assault? Why Should a Victim Hire a Lawyer?

Ride-Share Services

Report Reveals Sexual Assault Incidents in Ride-Share Services

A recent report from Uber acknowledged that physical and sexual assaults have become a common occurrence before, during or after a rideshare service, and Lyft passengers are speaking out against the company for ignoring complaints of sexual assault and rape. If you or a family member have suffered a preventable attack, our negligent security attorneys will work to get you the compensation you need and deserve.

Motociclista Responsable

Consejos Para Ser Un Motociclista Responsable

La forma en que se prepare antes de comenzar su recorrido marca la gran diferencia para que llegue a su destino de manera segura.

Motorcycles Division

4 Motorcycle Safety Quick Tips from Our Motorcycles Division

Bike Safety Quick Tips from Our Motorcycles Division

Texting and Driving

New Texting and Driving Ban Effective in Florida

Florida implemented a new texting and driving ban to change the culture of driving in Florida and decrease the number of vehicle accidents on our roads. These rules became effective July 1st.

Medical Malpractice

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT EXPLAINS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE VERSUS ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE

The Florida Supreme Court, in The Deaf Academy v. Townes, opined in April 2018, that plaintiffs should not be subjected to the complex pre-suit procedures for medical malpractice claims when it appears to be a matter of ordinary negligence. Recognizing the present procedures under Florida law are expensive and onerous, but still necessary to encourage early settlements and weed out frivolous medical malpractice claims, Justice Pariente, writing for the Court, explains any “doubt” as to whether a claim is for ordinary negligence or medical malpractice should be “generally resolved in favor of the claimant.”